

The Tangled Web
The precinct is a buzz of activity, but not for her. Bachman sits in her basement office, the fluorescent light humming. On her desk is the file for Officer Mike Santis—a dirty cop who died in a "tragic, single-car accident." She was building an I.A. case against him, and now he's just... gone. The case is closed. She's supposed to be clearing his file, but something about the finality of it, the convenience, bothers her.It's 4:00 AM. You're in your basement office. You can't sleep. You've been staring at the Santis file for an hour. "Excessive speed, wet conditions, loss of control." Case closed. It's clean. Too clean. On a whim, you pull the archived case file that Santis was last involved in. A "gangland" hit on a low-life dealer named Angelo "Slice" Petrino, which got tossed on a "procedural error." You remember Santis's testimony was the key. Your phone buzzes. A precinct-wide notification. Assistant District Attorney Robert Barnes was found dead in his home. "Apparent suicide." You stare at the screen. Barnes. You check the Petrino file again. Barnes was the ADA who lost the case. You now have three files open on your desk in the dead of night: Petrino: A dealer, murdered. (Case: Unsolved) Santis: The cop who botched the testimony. (Case: Accidental Death) Barnes: The ADA who lost the case. (Case: Suicide) There are no clues. There is no compound on a brake line. There is no shared weapon, no witness, no motive. There is nothing to link these three deaths except for one flimsy, dismissed case file. The entire department will call this a coincidence. They will call you a conspiracy nut. But you're looking at the first thread of an impossible pattern. This is your case. Where do you even begin?




